CFDEM®coupling - User Forum

This is a forum dedicated to CFDEM®coupling using the LIGGGHTS® DEM code and OpenSource CFD.

Particle-particle heat conduction and fluid velocity

Submitted by Luton on Thu, 08/27/2015 - 22:35

Hello all,

I am trying to study how the fluid flow velocity could influence (decrease) the temperature of particles.

I found some information about particle-particle and fluid-particle heat transfer but in my case I disregard the temperature of fluid. I only need the flow velocity as a parameter and how this parameter could change the temperature of the particle, I also need this parameter in the future for other purposes.

CFDEM LES model shear velocity

Submitted by Detian Liu on Thu, 08/13/2015 - 20:40

Dear CFDEMers,

I set up a case with dynamic Smagorinsky LES model, but I found one thing that, with the smooth case, LES model can give great result, but if I put one layer of sediment (fixed at bottom), the LES model still give the shear velocity u* like smooth wall, but the RANS model (komegaSST model) can recognize the particles and give a larger shear velocity which is close to the experiment.

Has anyone has met the same problem and could give me some advice on this?

Thank you so much!

Detian

Installation error: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -llagrangianCFDEM-PUBLIC-2.4.0

Submitted by anhvt2 on Wed, 08/12/2015 - 21:34

hello cfdem community,

i'm trying to run the command cfdemCompCFDEM to couple CFDEM with OpenFOAM-2.4.0 and it doesn't seem to work. Besides the RASModel.H and ompi/ error, the compilation gets stopped at /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -llagrangianCFDEM-PUBLIC-2.4.0. I've attached 3 logs file for your inspection. I've changed a few variables in ~/.bashrc as follows:

Error when running ErgunTestMPI with HerschelBulkley

Submitted by zhangzirui on Sun, 08/09/2015 - 14:25

Hi all,

I have a problem running the tutorial case ErgunTestMPI with the following transport property.

transportModel HerschelBulkley;
nu nu [ 0 2 -1 0 0 0 0 ] 1e-04;
rho rho [ 1 -3 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1000;
HerschelBulkleyCoeffs
{
nu0 nu0 [ 0 2 -1 0 0 0 0] 1;
tau0 tau0 [ 0 2 -2 0 0 0 0 ] 1e-03;
k k [ 0 2 -1 0 0 0 0 ] 1e-06;
n n [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1;
}

voidfraction still changes even use fix freeze

Submitted by cheng1988sjtu on Fri, 08/07/2015 - 23:10

Hi All,

I have a question about the fix freeze command in CFDEM coupling, as I found it's behavior is different from what's described in the docs (or, I'm doing something wrong, please help me with this:-() . I define particles in a region near the bottom to be type 2, and the other particles to be type 1. in the DEM part, I used the following line to freeze the particles of type 2:

......

group bottom type 2
group active type 1
fix 2 bottom freeze
velocity bottom set 0.0 0.0 0.0 units box

Scaling

Submitted by mytxii on Mon, 07/20/2015 - 15:36

Hello guys,

I want to simulate a small channel (11 micrometers) with small particles (2 micrometers).
Therefore I chose the "CGS" unit system. I tried to build a model with a 11 cm channel and 2 cm particles and it works fine.

But when I scale my region, neighbor, scaling coefficients, velocities, radiuses, blockMeshDict; it doesn't work anymore (Courant number rises very quick).

Problem of virtual mass force

Submitted by Detian Liu on Sat, 07/18/2015 - 23:43

Dear all,

Recently I have read the code of virtual mass force, but there is a question that:

the original force = 0.5*rho_f*V_p*(Du/Dt-du_s/dt)=0.5*rho_f*V_p*(du/dt+u*div(u)-du_s/dt)

is that means in our virtual mass force model we use:

if splitUrelCalculation, using (Du/Dt) instead of (Du/Dt-du_s/dt),

if not splitUreCalculation, using (Ur-Urold)/dt instead of (Du/Dt-du_s/dt).

Is my understanding of this right?

Thank you!

Detian
2015.7.18

hi folks

Submitted by naceur on Tue, 07/14/2015 - 23:26

I think all went well installing LIGGGHTS along with CFDEM

so happy after more than 15 days day and night :)

the only problem is that I can't see the results (postprocessing) I don't have matlab
and octave seems to not work well to be called it show many errors
i some one could help little I can go faster

here what I get when running
tutorials/cfdemSolverPisoScalar/packedBedTemp

every thing went well

till here postprocessing i think

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - CFDEM®coupling - User Forum