CFDEM®coupling - User Forum

This is a forum dedicated to CFDEM®coupling using the LIGGGHTS® DEM code and OpenSource CFD.

does CFDEM handle particle collisions analytically or by timestep?

Submitted by antonm5012 on Thu, 06/12/2014 - 17:05

I see two ways:

1) timestep integrating all the contact forces (normal and tangential - according to e.g spring dashpot model described in Kloss, Goniva, Hager et al papers)
which gives the velocity changes, new normal and tangential displacements and hence new values of forces

2) assuming the selected model and knowing the impact velocities, the loss of energy during the impact, collision duration and other parameters are calculated analytically which gives the after impact values of linear and angular velocities.
(looks like much faster way)

Modelling the sealing of a channel by a particle

Submitted by Daniell on Tue, 06/10/2014 - 15:57

Dear community,

the problem I want to model is based on the sealing of a fluidic channel by a large particle. I am quite new (and very fascinated) to the DEM-part of the CFD-DEM world and I need some input from you.

I prepared a small test-case that is modelling the closing of a ball check valve-type structure. I tried two solvers, Piso and IB. I figure IB is probably the right choice, but Piso is faster and I would prefer to use it. As you can see in the result plots, the channel isn't sealed fully by the particle with either solver:

how to define include path for compiling CFDEM-coupling

Submitted by oger on Sun, 06/08/2014 - 18:51

I am quite new in the CFDEM-coupling and after successfully install OpenFoam2.3. and LIGGGHTS-PUBLIC, I am trying to build the programs-solvers for CFDEM-coupling but I got an error during the compiling process after launching cfdemCompCFDEM
'could not open file mpi.h for source file subModels/forceModel/checkCouplingInterval/checkCouplingInterval.C due to No such file or directory'

of course the system include path includes /opt/mpich/include but still not functioning for this compiling case??

Where is my mistake ?
thanks for your help.

concentration

Riccardo Maione's picture
Submitted by Riccardo Maione on Fri, 06/06/2014 - 14:29

Hi all,

I want to simulate the combustion of char in a screw conveyor with CFDEM, but i am still fairly new to CFDEM and even if I have an idea on how to write the fluid part (i have already wrote the particle part) I would like to use the oxygen concentration in the gas phase to evaluate a combustion kinetic expression in the LIGGGHTS input. Is it possible with CFDEM? if yes, how?

thanks for your attention,

Problem while running twoSpheresGlowinskiMPI tutorial

Submitted by stevemoore1981 on Mon, 06/02/2014 - 09:20

Hi

I downloaded and built LIGGGHTS and CFDEM (basically following the steps in the CFDEM Coupling.pdf) with OpenFOAM-2.1.1 that was already installed on my system. As far as I can tell everything built correctly, but when running the twoSpheresGlowinskiMPI tutorial I find a strange error where the two particles don't appear to interact with the fluid in any way. I was wondering if anyone else had experienced an error like this?

cfdemSolverIB not found (other solvers OK)

Submitted by antonm5012 on Fri, 05/16/2014 - 12:00

Hi everyone,

I have a problem with the test twoSpheresGlowinski.
Other tests are working (ErgunMPI, settlingTestMPI, packedBedTemp), so I presume that cfdemSolverPiso and cfdemSolverPisoScalar do work normally.

What could cause a particular solver to be not compiled properly?

particle temperature drop simulation

kunzhang's picture
Submitted by kunzhang on Mon, 05/12/2014 - 18:08

Hi All,

I have set up a coupled CFD+DEM simulation to study the particles temperature drop by the cold wind. The initial particle temperature is 393K, the initial wind temperature is 293K. However, after 1800s, the lowest particle temperature is 248K (-25C) and highest temperature is 549K (275C). For the whole system at initial, the highest temperature is 393K and lowest temperature is 293K. It seems unreasonable for the particle temperature drop or increase so much. Could anyone please discuss about the possible reasons for that?

Thanks!

Kun

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - CFDEM®coupling - User Forum