CFDEM®coupling - User Forum

This is a forum dedicated to CFDEM®coupling using the LIGGGHTS® DEM code and OpenSource CFD.

The differences between "couplingInterval" and "couple/cfd couple_every"

Submitted by yirenxindudu on Wed, 02/06/2019 - 12:55

I am newer of CFDEM, recently I was confusing about the differences between "couplingInterval" and "couple/cfd couple_every".
"couplinginterval" locates in CFD/constant/couplingProperties, and "couple/cfd couple_every" is in DEM/in.liggghts_run
both of them are about the coupling properties of CFD-DEM calculation, but what's the difference between them?
Thank you very much!

bigParticle voidFraction doesn't give expected result?

Submitted by govind on Mon, 02/04/2019 - 09:54

Hello,

I am using bigParticle voidFraction model. For that grid size and particle size are equivalent. In couplingDictionary parameters are gives as:
porosity 64.0
weight 0.051625

cfdemCoupling runs nicely but per cell voidfraction doesn't change that much. When I have looked inside the source code, particle volume is multiplied by weight. I didn't get why volume is weighted by weight parameter? For the weight I am giving it reduces the particle volume so I have tried with weight of 64 but with this simulation doesn't run, courant number reaches very high.

CFDEM vs. Lagrangian solvers of OpenFOAM

Submitted by emahvelati on Mon, 02/04/2019 - 00:44

Hi All,

I am in the early stage of CFD-DEM and trying to find the best tool to conduct my research in the fields of solid particles. I am wondering what can be the best choice between CFDEM (OPENFOAM+LIGGGHTS) and original Lagrangian solvers of OpenFOAM? It seems that with LIGGGHTS the computational process can be much faster. Is that true?

Thanks in advance for your advice.

Is there any case of solid-liquid two-phase flow in a pipe?

Submitted by scoop_17 on Fri, 01/18/2019 - 16:43

Hello,
I‘m a beginner of CFDEM®coupling and only have experience of Openfoam. I wanna simulation the solid-liquid two-phase flow in a pipe by CFDEM®coupling. Is there any case of solid-liquid two-phase flow in a pipe?
I am confused about the mesh import in the cfdem case. It's same with openfoam?
And It seems that in all tutorial example, parallel operations have been taken and the meshes have been split. Can I run the case sequential and how?
Thanks,
Scoop

how to define meshwalls in both in.liggghts_init and in.liggghts_run

Submitted by yirenxindudu on Fri, 01/18/2019 - 04:04

Dear all,

recently, I faced a problem with CFD-DEM coupling.
both in.liggghts_init and in.liggghts_run need to define "mesh/surface" . I defined wall using STL files located in folder "meshes", the commends are as follows:
fix cv all mesh/surface file meshes/wall.stl type 1 #surface_vel -4.5 0. 0.
fix bx all mesh/surface file meshes/inlet.stl type 1
fix inface all mesh/surface file meshes/outlet.stl type 1
fix wall all wall/gran model hertz tangential history mesh n_meshes 2 meshes bx cv

Smoothing for Tsource in cfdemSolverPisoScalar.C

Submitted by yesaswi92 on Fri, 01/11/2019 - 01:20

Hello,

I'm trying to solve the heat transfer problem for a static particle bed with interstitial air. The particles are bigger than the mesh used for the CFD solution. From the source code, I see that the heat exchange field (EuField in cfdemSolverPisoScalar.C or the Tsource in cfdemSolverPisoScalar.C) is just being added to the CFD cells that coincide with particle centroids. But Tsource in all the other cells that also occupy this particle is being taken as zero.

I am wondering why not use a smoothing model to distribute this Tsource?

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - CFDEM®coupling - User Forum