LIGGGHTS® - User Forum

LIGGGHTS® related topics can be discussed here: discussion about models, installation, feature requests and general discussion

Voronoi Tesselation in Liggghts

PaulWinkler's picture
Submitted by PaulWinkler on Tue, 07/30/2013 - 22:57

Hi,

I just want to say there is a new Voronoi package for Lammps by Daniel Schwen. It supports now polydispers packings, calculation of the cell surface and much more. It's already included in the Lammps git repository. You can install and compile in Liggghts without major problems, but the delivered vorotest script has to be changed, Liggghts doesn't support inline variables and the abs() function for variables yet. Done that, the tests should run without any error.

Regards,

Paul

compute pressure & compute temp vs. compute stress/atom & compute reduce

PaulWinkler's picture
Submitted by PaulWinkler on Tue, 07/30/2013 - 22:36

Hi,

I need the average pressure between the particles. I tried two ways with exact the same results. compute pressure for all atoms using the temperature from a compute temp and compute stress/atom for every single particle and sum these with compute reduce. What would be faster? Is there a difference in speed between compute reduce sum and the variable sum() command?

Regards,

Paul

Run simulation until special event occurs

PaulWinkler's picture
Submitted by PaulWinkler on Tue, 07/30/2013 - 22:22

Hi,

I want to generate a dense packing with fix insert/pack and particle growing. This is very common and no problem with fix adapt. The growing ends when the particles have a reached a given pressure. The pressure is calculated by compute pressure. Since I have a lot of particles and slightly CPU I wonder if there is something new in interrupting a run when a special event occurs to save CPU time? Or is run N every n, check with if and going on else dump results and quit still the preferred solution?

Regards,

Paul

Missing Storage Values

Submitted by andriodr on Mon, 07/29/2013 - 21:56

I am using LIGGGHTS on a bluegene/p cluster and when I attempt to run a simulation I get an error that reads:

Could not locate a fix/property storing value(s) for youngsModulus as requested by gran/hooke. (modify_liggghts.cpp:247)

I checked with the sysadmin and he has told me that there is nothing wrong with the installation. I have version 2.3.5 installed. Any help or direction at all would be greatly appreciated.

Adhesion between particles and walls

Submitted by RocheDEM on Sat, 07/27/2013 - 18:08

Hi,

I am wondering how the adhesion between the particles and the wall is treated. I have set up my simulation with 3 different types, 1 is the particles, 2 is the walls, and 3 is for a no friction/no adhesion symmetry plane. I have specified the cohesion as:

fix m6 all property/global cohesionEnergyDensity peratomtypepair 3 &
1000000 1000000 0000001 &
1000000 0000001 0000001 &
0000001 0000001 0000001

How to include the potential energy in the granular simulation

Submitted by lin on Fri, 07/26/2013 - 11:18

I am using the sphere type for the granular simulation, how could I include the potential force in the simulation? I tired us the Pair_style hybrid gran/hertz/history lj/cut 2.5. But I get an error message” pair hybrid sub-style is not used”. Can someone help me out? thanks in advance

Cohesion

Submitted by RocheDEM on Wed, 07/24/2013 - 18:57

I typically use the fix_nve integration (only updates position and linear velocity) for my granular simulations as this gives a good approximation of blocky (angular) material behaviour. I am wondering if the sjkr cohesion model can be used with this integrator or do I need to use fix_nve_sphere to get cohesion?

In the mean time, I am making a little test model.

Thank you,

Kirk

Wrong diameter in dump image [solved]

PaulWinkler's picture
Submitted by PaulWinkler on Mon, 07/22/2013 - 00:06

Hi,

playing around with the dump image command I came over a restiveness. I inserted some atoms in a lattice with create_atoms, and changed diameter to 0.2 by set command. Computes and dump local/custom are working like expected. The command dump image ignores diameter and uses 1.0, after dump_modify adiam it works as well. Is it because of using create_atom?

Edit:

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - LIGGGHTS® - User Forum