LIGGGHTS® - User Forum

LIGGGHTS® related topics can be discussed here: discussion about models, installation, feature requests and general discussion

Segmentation fault when using fix massflow/mesh?

Submitted by DanielDroop on Mon, 08/26/2013 - 16:26

Dear all,
i'm trying to use the fix massflow/mesh with liggghts version 2.3.6 and get a segmentation fault after some timesteps. My setup to test and reproduce the message is a simple cube without a bottom or lid. Some atoms will be placed inside, fall down and leave the box throuth the bottom and re-enter the box from above (since there is a periodic boundry in z-axis).

I attached the testcase with my liggghts script, the logfile and two mesh files. Please remove the ".txt" extension before using it.

Many thanks in advance!

Cheers,
Daniel

Problem of mass computation in a hybrid simulation

JF's picture
Submitted by JF on Fri, 08/23/2013 - 16:17

Hi all,

When I perform a hybrid simulation (granular-peridynamics), I observe in the pair_gran_h*.cpp that the mass of the particle (rmass) is equal to the density.

If I try to fix the problem from the file loaded by the command read_data, it's worse !!!

So, if I compute the mass of the particle into the file pair_gran_h*.cpp, Do I have to take care to affect the good value of the mass in an other file ?

Or Have you a simple way to fix this problem ?

Thanks in advance for your request

Regards
JF

Call variables

Submitted by rcabiscol on Fri, 08/23/2013 - 14:16

Hi!

I want to use some of the output variables of LIGGGHTS, such as fx or x, for a range of particle. I want to make some calculations in the input file for, finally, export them at the dump file.

However, I don't know how to call and store them in an array.

Thank you for your help!

Ramon

LIGGGHTS 2.3.6 - fix move/mesh linear/variable possible bug

Submitted by wladek on Wed, 08/21/2013 - 17:22

I tried to make one of my mesh accelerating with time, so after digging in documentation I found this fix move/mesh linear/variable, however whatever variable I tried to put I constantly had an error:

"Variable name 1 for fix move/mesh linear/variable does not exist"

an error comes from the file "mesh_mover.cpp" line 112 and it is natural consequence if something goes wrong in lines above.

Correct me if I am wrong but lines 97 to 110 in this file are not quite correct and as it is so, there always something is going wrong.

pair_style and integration nvt or nve

Submitted by rasoul on Wed, 08/21/2013 - 14:55

I have a question about pair_style. I'd like to simulate solid materials such as shale, clay, sand, and like this. I need to know what the appropriate pair_style for doing that is?

Another question is about integration. In my project I have to decrease temperature from X1 to X2. How can I do that?
And using "fix integer nvt/sphere temp X1 X2 DX" is true or not?

Thanks a lot for the response in advance.

Temperature control

Submitted by rasoul on Tue, 08/20/2013 - 20:50

For doing a project I face some unknowns.

The one is that I want to simulate crack propagation in shale (a type of
sand) and investigate crack pattern in shale if I decrease the temperature by LIGGGHTS. I need to know how I can decrease it (temperature of the simulation box)?

Second is that do you know the material properties of shale?

The easiest way is to fix the temperature of some particles, I need to know how I can set it to a certain temperature every few time-steps?

Thanks a lot for your attention in advance.

Sincerely,
Rasoul

How to determine the maximum contact force

richti83's picture
Submitted by richti83 on Tue, 08/20/2013 - 08:59

I've a question about computing the maximum contact force
I know I can get the pair-force with
compute 2 all pair/gran/local force
But How to calculate the magnitude ?
(I tried variable fmag atom sqrt(c_2[1]^2+c_2[2]^2+c_2[3]^2) but got ERROR: Mismatched compute in variable formula)

Next problem is how to find the maximum of fmag, I tried
variable fmax equal max(fmag)
but got "ERROR: Invalid special function in variable formula"

Large region casuing slow performance, how to speed up?

Submitted by keepfit on Fri, 08/16/2013 - 20:14

Hi Chris,

I created a large region compared to the radii of particles, and the time-stepping becomes very slow.

region reg block -0.01 8.1 0.0 1.51 -0.01 4.51 units box

The particles radii varies from 0.008 to 0.016, and total # of particles is 10k. So the region is mostly empty.

I tried using shrink-wrapped "boundary s s s" but the issue remains.

Triaxial test implementation

Submitted by afsalaza on Thu, 08/15/2013 - 02:00

Hello everyone,
I have been using Liggghts for a couple weeks and I have already done a simple shear test but now I want to do a triaxial test. I read about the servo control walls but since the test is a cylindrical moving boundary I dont think that is a proper boundary because of two reasons:
1. The walls are rigid boundary and in reality they are flexible.
2. I can not think of moving the cilindrical walls with out changing the shape or leaving a gap.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - LIGGGHTS® - User Forum