CFDEM®coupling - User Forum

This is a forum dedicated to CFDEM®coupling using the LIGGGHTS® DEM code and OpenSource CFD.

Voidfraction Postprocessing

Submitted by cgrohs on Mon, 02/13/2017 - 16:55

Hello,

After a LIGGGHTS calculation (of filling particles into a box) I'd like to calculate the void fraction. This should be done in a postprocessing step. (Later on I want to wiggle the box and look at the change of the void fraction.) In earlier versions of LIGGGHTS, CFDEM and openFOAM I used the files of the fillCylinder tutorial as a guideline but the fillCylinder tutorial does not work any more. I get:
--> FOAM FATAL ERROR: setCG() not executed correctly!

CFDEMcoupling version: cfdem-3.6.0
OF version: 3.0.x

si-cgs scale conversion

Submitted by paulaalejandrayo on Fri, 02/03/2017 - 15:41

Hello, I am trying to change si scale to cgs. I made the change in liggghts side and in OF part, but I am having some different behaviours. I run the settlingTestMPI using two different values for the kinematic viscosity in both cases and plotted v_y velociy as a function of time.
In liggghts side I changed unit, diameter, density, gravity and young modulus.

twoSpheresGlow...Tutorial

Submitted by paulaalejandrayo on Thu, 02/02/2017 - 14:50

Hello, I am sorry if this a too basic question, but I am trying to understand what each parameter in the twoSpheresGlow... tutorial does and I am having some problems. Basically if I remove gravity in the DEM part particles start to go up instead of going down and that has sense because lift force. But, DEM is in "si" units and CFD is too. I added a rho file to CFD/0 folder and rho is equal to the density of the DEM particles but particles still move up. So, my questions are: Is there other field affecting the system? does rho internal field equal 1.5 mean fluid density equal 1.5?

Guidelines for “reasonable” 2d simulations

Submitted by AliBlues on Fri, 01/27/2017 - 15:11

Hi,
Though downscaling from 3d to 2d cannot be performed properly in CFDEM simulations, as some of the feature still consider the atom type to be sphere rather than a disk, there are times which one just wants to check whether a concept would work or not, and an initial 2d simulation would be sufficient. I’ve checked the following link on steps to take for performing 2d simulations
http://www.cfdem.com/media/DEM/docu/Section_howto.html

wrong void fraction at the inlet boundary

Submitted by gelinhan on Mon, 01/23/2017 - 11:17

Hi there,

I am now using CFDEM to simulate a simple liquid-solid fluidized bed with a void fraction of 0.53. I used the divided void fraction model. However, the void fraction close to the inlet I got were close to 1 which caused the bottom particles staying nearly still. Please kindly find attached the image of the void fraction.

How to run case with explicitCoupling

Submitted by AliBlues on Wed, 01/18/2017 - 10:03

Hi,
I was wondering how can I run a case using explicitCoupling. I understand that implicit coupling provides better stability, but based on what I've been reading in the literature the explicit coupling is more accurate. So referring to the settling case tutorial, cfdemSolverPiso/settlingTestMPI, I made the following adjustments in constant/couplingProperties:

//--------------------------------------------------------------------
momCoupleModels
(
explicitCouple
//implicitCouple
);

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - CFDEM®coupling - User Forum