LIGGGHTS® - User Forum

LIGGGHTS® related topics can be discussed here: discussion about models, installation, feature requests and general discussion

How to calculate the magnitude and average of contact force?

Submitted by Rachel on Thu, 01/17/2019 - 03:56

Hi colleagues,

I am facing a problem about outputing the magnitude and average of contact force, but failed.
To obtain the contact force, I use command:
compute fc all pair/gran/local pos id force (the 10-12th values are the contact forces on x,y,z directions)

Then I use:
variable avefc atom sqrt(c_fc[10]^2+c_fc[11]^2+c_fc[12]^2)
to calculate the magnitude of contact force.

Invoking a python script from liggghts input script

Submitted by Adithya Ramgopal on Wed, 01/16/2019 - 09:16

Hello all,

I need to invoke a python script during the run time of the simulation . The script has to be invoked in every timestep. Is there a possibility to do that?
I know the other way around (python->Liggghts) is possible. But I need to compute some paramaters outside liggghts at each and every timestep and I need to use that data again in the simulation. So please suggest me some ideas on this.

Thank you .

A modified heat conduction model in LIGGGHTS

Submitted by Weijing on Mon, 01/14/2019 - 01:16

Hi everyone,

I have recently implemented a modified heat conduction model in LIGGGHTS. If anyone is interested in using and discussing about this piece of work, uploaded in ArXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.01379, please drop me an email weijing.dai@sydney.edu.au.

Cheers
Weijing

Validation of superquadric contact force calculation [Podlozhnyuk et al. (2017)]

Submitted by lumblab227 on Sat, 01/12/2019 - 15:43

I have read the paper by Podlozhnyuk et al. (2017) and curious about the contact force calculation.

Referring to Fig. 6, it is shown that different results of adopting different radius method.

And I have written a script to examine the results.

However I have got the results of the volume equivalent sphere. And I could see the big difference from the FEM results if I keep increasing the overlap.

Is there any comment on it?

Or it would be appreciated if you could give your experience on examine it?

Kind regards,

liggghts and implicit time integration

Submitted by AliBlues on Thu, 01/10/2019 - 19:48

Hello,
Is there a way implement a particular force exerted from the fluid side on the particle to be integrated using implicit time integration, ASIDE from the dragforce. It seems there is a possibility to integrate ONLY the drag force implicitly:
https://github.com/CFDEMproject/LIGGGHTS-PUBLIC/blob/master/src/fix_cfd_...

simulating compression of particles

Submitted by kuhsteak on Wed, 01/09/2019 - 13:10

Hi everyone,

i am working on a liggghts simulation of a plastic extruder for my master thesis.
On my adventure with DEM i noticed that the soft particle approach wants to have only small overlaps between particles (< 0.5%d).
In my real life case the particles are getting deformed in their way through the extruder. Wich leads to some questions:

1)How does a Youngs Modulus exceeding the limit of 5e6 Pa change my simulation. (in older versions i had to add "hard-particels: yes")

Breaking of multisphere particles

Submitted by Rustam on Tue, 01/08/2019 - 12:40

Hello all, I am new in LIGGGHTS, and I need help)
Can I have an example of a simulation where multisphere particles breakdown due to mutual abrasion?

In my project I'm going to simulate abrasion breakdown of particles in fluidizied bed reactor, and I have no idea how to do it.

Thanks, Rustam.

Convergence of the superquadrics contact point

Submitted by domprims on Thu, 12/27/2018 - 12:46

Hello experts!

I have some problems with the convergence of the contact point of two touching superquadrics. The contact between two superquadrics remains undiscovered if the blockiness value exceeds a certain treshold. For the attached example the superquadrics with blockiness value n_1 = n_2 = 5 touch each other but if the blockiness is n_1 = n_2 = 10 there is a complete overlap without contact recognition. So far I have not been successful in solving the problem by using a smaller timestep or an alternative neighbor bin size value.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - LIGGGHTS® - User Forum