LIGGGHTS® - User Forum

LIGGGHTS® related topics can be discussed here: discussion about models, installation, feature requests and general discussion

chasing an odd result

Submitted by jgoldsmith on Sun, 01/27/2013 - 16:59

Hi folks,

I am trying to chase down what would cause particles when dropped into a cylindrical container to settle in a bowl shape. that is the outer particles are a number of cm higher than the ones at the center.

I have included an image of the settled particles in this state as well as the input script that was used for this.

error when using fix move/mesh rotate

Submitted by knoe_ph on Wed, 01/16/2013 - 15:16

Hello,

I get an error message when using the fix move/mesh rotate command:

"Fix move/mesh (id rot): only one reference point allowed (fix_move_mesh.cpp:221)"

I'm not sure what his means and I dont know how to solve it.

I got an .stl file, which i first move by

"fix move/mesh linear"

This works fine. After that I unfix this command and use

"fix move/mesh rotate"

where I get the discribed error message.

Regards
Philipp

atom/vtk output format

Submitted by ahobbs on Wed, 01/16/2013 - 10:08

I'm trying to use the new atom/vtk dump format...

According to the documentation the syntax is

dump ID group-ID style N file args

where atom/vtk args = none

I've tried the following:

dump dmp all atom/vtk 800 post/dump*.vtk

But I get the error: Invalid dump style (output.cpp:399)

Any suggestions from the LIGGGHTS gurus? Also with no arguments what exactly is exported with the atom/vtk output?

Am I using rolling_friction correctly?

Submitted by msandli on Mon, 01/14/2013 - 06:33

As subject says, I'm not sure if I'm implementing the "rolling_friction" part of the granular style correctly. I am simply trying to drain particles from a wedge shaped hopper and measure the mass flow rate using different values for friction. However, turning on rolling friction appears to have no effect, nor does changing the values for rolling friction - my mass flow rates are identical to not having rolling friction turned on.

want particle-wall contact, but no particle-particle contact

Submitted by evansmuts on Thu, 01/10/2013 - 13:47

Hi

Is it possible to have no particle-particle contact, but still have particle-wall contact? I want to test something were I don't have particles colliding with each other, but I need them to contact the walls so that they stay inside to domain.

As far as I understand it, I need "pair_style /gran/X" so that particle-wall contact can be calculated, so I have to specify that pair_style.

Visualisation of walls

Submitted by knoe_ph on Tue, 01/08/2013 - 11:24

Hallo,

I would like to know if it is possible to visualise walls in paraview, which are implemented via "fix wall/gran/hooke/history".

For stl files, I dump the vtk files via dump mesh/vtk and open them in paraview, but this doesnt work for "normal" boundary walls (or does it?). Would be glad if someone may help me.

Kind regards
Philipp

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - LIGGGHTS® - User Forum