LIGGGHTS® - User Forum

LIGGGHTS® related topics can be discussed here: discussion about models, installation, feature requests and general discussion

the Origin of .stl geometry in Paraview

Submitted by ZYan on Sun, 02/16/2014 - 19:41

I imported my stl geometry (created using solidworks) into Paraview. I found the Origin of this stl geometry was not the same as bofore being imported. Did someone come across this problem? My antoher question is how the coordinates of the CAD geometry is read in the Paraview?
Thank you,

ZYan

insert_every problem

Submitted by chenxizh on Fri, 02/14/2014 - 03:13

I want to simulate a particle inlet boundary with given solid volume fraction and velocity, i.e the solid volume fraction and velocity in this boudary region is always fixed. I defined a region above the boundary, calculated the massrate, and used the insert/rate/region command. Since I want to keep the solid volume fraction fixed, should I set the insert_every to be 1?
I found many warnings come out.

SPH-DEM coupling

Submitted by ddd555 on Thu, 02/13/2014 - 16:43

Hi everyone,

I need to make a fluid-particle simulation but I can't use CFD for the fluid because of the length scale of my particles interactions. According to this, i'm looking to make a mesoscale coupling between SPH and DEM. I know that LIGGGHTS has both models but is it possible to couple them?

Thanks in advance.

[SOLVED] compute inertia/molecule

Submitted by Anonymous on Mon, 02/03/2014 - 17:00

Hi,

when I am trying to use the compute inertia/molecule on a molecule defined by fix rigid, I receive an error message like:
"ERROR: Invalid compute style (modify.cpp:883)"

I compiled LIGGGHTS together with the MOLECULE package and I am wondering why this would be an invalid compute style?

My files are attached to this post.

Best regards,
MiRa

.stl geometry

Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 01/28/2014 - 12:24

Hi Colleagues,
I have problems with the .stl geometry rencently. I used SolidWorks to create
3D geometric models and then save them in .stl format as the mesh walls. However,
when I viewed the geometry with Paraview, they looked like solid. I noitced in the tutorial examples, all the geomery are surface mesh (please see the attached figures). the example.png is from the tutorial example, and the myexample.png shows my own example.

I failed to save plane/surface in the solidwork as .stl.

How to choose an optimal time increment?

Submitted by jw851602 on Tue, 01/28/2014 - 10:33

Hello,

I'm thinking about how to choose the optimal time increment for my simulations. I set up a very simple testcase in order to study the behaviour of contact interaction between particles and STL-geometries, defined as wall.
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBf3vUwHh-w
First, I calculated the timestep as provided by many posts in this forum with the formula dt = 0.2*dt_rayleigh:
r = 0.005
rho = 8000
Y = 5e6
nu = 0.3
G = Y/(2*(1+nu)) = 1923076.92

gravity changing with time

Riccardo Maione's picture
Submitted by Riccardo Maione on Wed, 01/22/2014 - 15:58

Hi all,

I am trying to do simulation on a rotary drum, simulating the rotation by changing the gravity force. I hope you could help me. Here is my code:

atom_style granular
atom_modify map array
boundary p p p
echo screen
newton off

units si

communicate single vel yes

region reg block 0 2.4 0 0.314 0 0.314 units box
create_box 1 reg

neighbor 0.02 bin
neigh_modify delay 0

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - LIGGGHTS® - User Forum