CFDEM®coupling - User Forum

This is a forum dedicated to CFDEM®coupling using the LIGGGHTS® DEM code and OpenSource CFD.

CFDEM and LIGGGHTS installation after installing OpenFOAM

Submitted by NIKHIL on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 17:00

Hello everyone,
I have installed OpenFOAM2.1.x. As per the procedure given in pdf (name of pdf file is githubAccess_public.pdf available at download section of Open source CFD-DEM), at the page number 3 of pdf at the last line it is not clear what is written, i think something is missing there.Also after executing CFDEMCompLIG (given on page 4) i am getting error of following type:
Please Help me get rid of this error.

Makefile:93: fix_wall_gran_hertz_history_simple.d: No such file or directory
Makefile:93: fix_wall_gran_hooke.d: No such file or directory

facing high courant number while running the case in OpenFOAM

Submitted by NIKHIL on Tue, 07/10/2012 - 12:33

Hi,
I am trying to simulate the incompressible flow of water through a cylinder.The cylinder at its base have many small circular openings.I have made the mesh of required geometry through gmesh.But while executing the file in OpenFoam the courant number is becoming high.My pressure and velocity fields are as follows:

/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
| ========= | |
| \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox |

stoped or crashed with "Segmentation fault"

Submitted by ngcw1986 on Wed, 06/13/2012 - 11:32

Dear CFDEM users,
I am using the CFDEM 2.3 and have been bothered with "Segmentation fault" errors these days. I have done a few cases using this version and it worked fine, at lest no strange errors. But recently I set up a case almost the same with the other one except for the drag force, and the "Segmentation fault" error emerged along. The case will "cash" or stop at somewhere around 0.2s whaterver I change the settings, and the output is like this:

Time = 0.17394

Courant Number mean: 0.0454717 max: 1.05449
- evolve()
Starting up LIGGGHTS
Executing command: 'run 10 '

resolved vs. unresolved CFDEM

Submitted by evansmuts on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 16:01

Hi

I was wondering what the difference is between "resolved" and "unresolved" CFD-DEM? If I am correct, the solver "cfdemSolverIB" uses resolved CFD-DEM with the "immersed boundary" method.

One obvious benefit is that a finer CFD mesh can be used (smaller than the particle). This would give more accurate flow calculations, but with greater computational expense I am guessing. Is there extra computational expense, other than the extra CFD cells?

CFDEMcoupling 2.4.0

Submitted by nom on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 11:15

Hello,

Thanks for the new CFDEM release.
Is there a new way of running CFDEM 2.4.0 cases?
I tried to run the tutorial "ErgunTestMPI" with "mpirun -np 2 cfdemSolverPiso -parallel" but it fails due to an openmpi error:
=====================================================
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
It looks like MPI_INIT failed for some reason; your parallel process is
likely to abort. There are many reasons that a parallel process can
fail during MPI_INIT; some of which are due to configuration or environment

createFields.H is missing when compile cfdemPostC in cfdem 2.4.0

skyopener's picture
Submitted by skyopener on Thu, 06/07/2012 - 11:58

hello
thx for the newest version of cfdem.!!
Everything is ok except for the cfdemPostCalc.
it seems that the createFields.H is missing in the application/utilities/cfdemPostCalc..
after I copy a file from solvers/cfdemSolverPiso, everything goes somothly.
thx.
s.l

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - CFDEM®coupling - User Forum