CFDEM®coupling - User Forum

This is a forum dedicated to CFDEM®coupling using the LIGGGHTS® DEM code and OpenSource CFD.

Pair granular with shear history requires newton pair off

aikder's picture
Submitted by aikder on Thu, 12/10/2020 - 06:02

I am using Liggghts-Public with cfdem coupling version 3.8 to simulate a triaxial test.

I saved the state of my first simulation with write_restart in order to reload it in another simulation

On loading the binary restart file into the new simulation, i got this error:
"Pair granular with shear history requires newton pair off"

I checked from the error section of the documentation the information i got was:
"This is a current restriction of the implementation of pair granular styles with history."

dump custom fx fy fz

Submitted by Yingzhi on Thu, 11/26/2020 - 01:38

Hi everyone!

I am new to CFDEM. Now, I try to use dump custom fx fy fz to output the resultant force of each particle. However, I am confused if the drag force from the fluid is already included in fx, fy and fz or not.

In addition, to record the contact force between the particle and wall, I use the 'dump wall/gran/local force'. I am also confused if the cohesion force from the cohesion contact model is included in 'dump wall/gran/local force'.

Could someone please help me solve these diffusions, as this is very important for me to continue my current work.

output individual forceModel results

Submitted by mcsk2000 on Fri, 10/30/2020 - 06:07

HI,

From the tutorials, the total of forceModel is output as f_dragforce for an atom and c_dragtotal for the entire particles.
I am wondering whether CFDEM can output the individual forceModel results per atom.

For example,

f_KochHillDrag, f_gradPForce, f_viscForce, and etc.

Best regards,

Solver Compilation Problem

Submitted by kiran_ms on Sun, 10/18/2020 - 22:17

I recently completed the installation and compiling of CFDEM-Coupling and tried to run the packedBedTemp case provided in the tutorials. However, there was an error(something concerning mpirun and cfdemSolverPiso). As for the compilation, there were no issues with cfdemCompCFDEMsrc and cfdemCompCFDEMuti, but there persisted a missing operator error when I run cfdemCompCFDEMsol(although the log files suggest that the compilation was successful).

I have attached all the necessary log files.

Kindly request all of you to help me resolve this issue

Thanks in Advance

Particle and model size which can be used

Submitted by Pankhi Singh on Mon, 09/28/2020 - 16:27

Hey
Can anyone tell me what is the maximum no. of particles I can stimulate in CFDEM in one time?
And also the minimum size of the model in which I can carryout my stimulation? Like what can be the minimum dimensions of a tube in which I can carry out my stimulation?

Particle disappearing (cfdemSolverPiso) without any error message

Min Zhang's picture
Submitted by Min Zhang on Thu, 08/27/2020 - 01:25

I am simulating particle transport in a rough fracture, and the rough fracture geometry and simulation screenshots are attached.

I simulated for both Newtonian fluid (fluid viscosity = 1cP, 10cP, 100cP) and non-Newtonian fluid (shear-thinning fluid).

In a lot of cases, I did not have the particle disappearing issue. But I am having the particle disappearing issue in some cases: (1) Newtonian fluid viscosity = 100cP and (2) Non-Newtonian fluid.

The total particle number in the simulation domain changing with time plot is attached.

set of commands using liggghtsCommandModel with multiple executes

Submitted by mschramm on Sun, 08/23/2020 - 07:20

Hello,
I am looking to do multiple commands during each of the coupling steps.
I was hopeful that i would be able to create an execute command that would
read another liggghts script and then continue the simulation, but was unable to do so.
I tried both include and jump.

using ramp operation for a time dependent moving wall in coupled cfdem

Submitted by malte on Mon, 08/17/2020 - 16:09

Hi,
actually I try to set up a coupled cfdem case. I have a box with one moving wall. The wall velocity has to change with time, so I tried to use the ramp operation for this. Before I start the coupled simulation I fill the box with particles within 50000 timesteps. With constant wall moving everything works fine. My implementation of the ramp operation looks like the following:

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - CFDEM®coupling - User Forum