LIGGGHTS® - User Forum

LIGGGHTS® related topics can be discussed here: discussion about models, installation, feature requests and general discussion

Particles in lattice disappear through bottom wall

Submitted by rudranarayan on Thu, 08/04/2011 - 21:04

I have been running many simulations with a Lattice of granular particles with different CAD meshes interacting with them. There has been one major problem that i have not been able to figure out. When my timestep is any higher then 10^-7 gravity will pull the particles right through the bottom ZWall for no apparent reason. This results in the loss of all my particles after a short period of time. And they don't just fall out of the simulation, when they hit the bottom zwall the entire row of particles just disappears.

Particles not interacting with .stl Walls

Submitted by willroc7 on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 19:00

Greetings. I am attempting to run a simple compaction program of particles in a cylinder. I seem to get a successful packing of particles but they do not interact with the topwall as it moves down in the z direction. Using the cohesion and compression examples as templates, I have the following code:

#Contact model example

dimension 3
atom_style granular #diameter, density, angular velocity
atom_modify map array #processor stores lookup table of length N, N atoms. fast but limited by memory
boundary f f f #fixed boundaries in 3 dimensions

Adhesive force depending from impact velocity

Submitted by steve on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 09:20

I am trying to achieve an adhesive force which is higher when two particles crash with higher velocity.
My idea was to change gamma_n. Therefor I want to use the Hertz/history/stiffness model. By looking at the equations I noticed that the equations for gamman and gammat looks different from Hertz/history because they don't use Sn and St.
Now I am not quiet sure how to calculate gamma_n and gamma_t.
It would be nice to get a short advice. Thanks.

liggghts installation issue

Submitted by techblast333 on Tue, 08/02/2011 - 20:17

command: git clone http://cfdem.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/cfdem/liggghts myliggghts

error:
Cloning into myliggghts...
fatal: http://cfdem.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/cfdem/liggghts/info/refs not found: did you run git update-server-info on the server?

plz help me out to solve this problem. i have also allowed port 9418 through firewall

using insert/pack command with geometry

Submitted by akimbrell on Thu, 07/28/2011 - 00:45

I have an STL file that I want to pack with particles, I have noticed that the region command seems to only take .vtk files as input. Am I missing a parameter for an STL file or is this the case? Secondly, if it only takes vtk files then what programs are available to convert an STL to VTK file format? I tried saving the STL as VTK in paraview but it didn't seem to work properly.

Austin

load balancing

Submitted by stefanb on Wed, 07/27/2011 - 10:16

Hi Christoph,

I've got a question about load balancing. In the pdf you uploaded (conference in Trondheim) there is something showed about load balancing. It seems already implemented into liggghts but I didn't find anything about it in the manual. Could you give me an advice where to find if if it is already implemented.

Torque on axle exerted by particles

Submitted by moritzhoefert on Wed, 07/27/2011 - 09:42

Hi everyone,

the case I am simulating consists of a bunch of particles stirred in a tank. The geometry of the stirrer is available in stl format.

I would like to calculate the torque exerted on the stirrer or the axle moving it, respectively. I've played around with fix mesh/gran/stressanalysis and its capabilities are almost what I need. Is there a way in liggghts to integrate the stresses such that I get the resulting torque on the axle?

Thanks for any comments.

Best regards,
Moritz

coordination number for granular system

Submitted by saraanvari on Sat, 07/23/2011 - 14:08

I have tried to calculate coordination number for a compact data-set with the command compute/cord/gran and got a very low number so I decided to write separate code and do this calculation. I considered two particles to be neighbors if their distance is less than or equal to the sum of their radii and got a reasonable result. I don't know why there is such a difference.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - LIGGGHTS® - User Forum