LIGGGHTS® - User Forum

LIGGGHTS® related topics can be discussed here: discussion about models, installation, feature requests and general discussion

Coupling FEA and DEM

Submitted by zamir on Fri, 01/13/2012 - 07:28

Hey all, I just wanted to share this. I'm working on a tool-soil interaction problem in which both the displacement of the soil and the deformation of the tool is important. I will be coupling LIGGGHTS and Code Aster to perform the simulation. I have started a blog to document my progress (and to keep me motivated!!!)

It can be found at http://coolsimulations.wordpress.com

SPH and walls - bugfix

aaigner's picture
Submitted by aaigner on Thu, 01/12/2012 - 12:11

Hello all, hi Moritz!

Because of the forum threat SPH and walls you find attached my input script.

@Moritz: Two mistakes were in your input script:

  • Regions may not overlap in areas, which should be treated as walls.
  • In your case the union-command creates additional convex corners, which are not calculated accurately.

I inserted also comments to my modifications.

I modified your script only for bug fixing. I did not check any physical properties (viscosity,...), time step, ...

Solidification with SPH pairstyle

Submitted by davidf on Sun, 01/08/2012 - 20:27

Hello dear liggghts community members !

I'm interested to simulate using the SPH pairstyle cooling and subsequent solidification of a mixture of 2 liquid phases.
I know there's a heat conduction fix in liggghts , but i'm not sure if the sph particle parameters actually depend on temperature\pressure so the material properties could change appropriately to liquid->solid phase transition.

Is liggghts capabale of simulating solidification ? What would be a good start towards this direction ?

generation of non-spherical particles in LIGGGHTS

Submitted by keepfit on Fri, 12/30/2011 - 19:22

Hi Christoph,

I was wondering, how do you generate non-spherical particles in LIGGGHTS according to the mesh scanned from Laser Scanner?

1) Simply fill in single particle inside the mesh manually with minimum number of particles?

2) or fill in automatically by means of certain algorithm according to the points or surfaces?

I can't completely fill the cylindrical Container

Submitted by mahdi_roozbeh on Mon, 12/26/2011 - 04:05

Hi Friends:

I don't know why I can not completely fill the container. Here is the snip of my code.

boundary p p f
region reg cylinder z 0.0 0.0 10 0.00 50 units box
create_box 1 reg
fix m1 all property/global youngsModulus peratomtype 5.e9
fix m2 all property/global poissonsRatio peratomtype 0.45
fix m3 all property/global coefficientRestitution peratomtypepair 1 .3
fix m4 all property/global coefficientFriction peratomtypepair 1 .5

pair_style gran/hertz/history 1 0 #Hertzian without cohesion
timestep 0.00001

fix gravi all gravity 9.81 vector 0.0 0.0 -1.0

fix print for torque

Claudio Wolfer's picture
Submitted by Claudio Wolfer on Mon, 12/19/2011 - 14:00

Hi all,

I'm trying to write the total torque to an output file. For doing this I've read:
(1) Torque on axle exerted by particles (Forum-Post at 27.07.2011)
(2) Compute pair/gran/local (Forum-Post at 16.12.2010)
(3) fix print command (in the LIGGGHTS-doc)
(4) fix mesh/gran/stressanalysis command (in the LIGGGHTS-doc)
(5) fix_mesh_gran_stressanalysis.cpp (sourcecode)

But I do still not know how to write the total torque out. The question in (1) describes exactly what I will do.

Coordination Number Dependent Pair Style

Submitted by willroc7 on Fri, 12/16/2011 - 19:18

I am interested in creating or modifying an existing pair style (such as pair_gran_hertz_history) so that it uses different contact behavior as a function of the number of touching neighbors, or coordination number. Does like this sound like something that is possible in LIGGGHTS? How and where is the coordination number stored in the program? Could I use it as a variable in the pair style's C++ file?

Thanks in advance,
Will

Error: lost atoms

Submitted by marc on Fri, 12/16/2011 - 12:21

Hi There,

I'm having a problems when running my simulations. The following error happens:
ERROR: Lost atoms: original 1976 current 1971
I have tried to change some parameters like reducing the time step, reduce the entry surface size and so, but I couldn't find out what causes this problem.
The case is simple, it is a box in the top of a conveyor. I'm using particles distribution from 60 to 250 mm diameter.
I'd appreciate any help about what could cause this problem.
Best regards,
Marc

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - LIGGGHTS® - User Forum