Young Modulus problem

Noel682's picture
Submitted by Noel682 on Fri, 10/16/2015 - 17:09

Hi all... developers and users,

I am very new to LIGGGHTS and I have a question about an exercise:

# Using: LIGGGHTS (Version LIGGGHTS-PUBLIC 3.2.1)

# EXERCISE DESCRIPTION:
I have to insert a spherical particle (with no initial velocity) in a gravitational field, from an initial height of 10m. The particle can fall until a lower boundary (wall) set at 0 meters.
- In the "read.packing" you can see the 1) particle diameter 2) density 3) initial coordinates 4) velocities and 5) the box.
- The only force affecting the particle must be the gravitational force, therefore a vertical 1 D bounce is expected.

I am using Hertz, as contact model between wall and particle. I am conducting the same exercise in LIGGGHTS and MATLAB . in matlab I have conducted the same exercise in analytically and numerically, defining stiffness, viscosity and restitution as LIGGGHTS does (http://nf.nci.org.au/facilities/software/LIGGGHTS/doc/pair_gran.html)

# PROBLEM / QUESTION

If I solve the exercise analytically and numerically (in Matlab), the same bounce (plot of time - position) is obtained when the stiffness insert in both script of Matlab (both scripts) is equal to

Y = 5e6

While in the LIGGGHTS code is equal to

Y = 9.45e6

While Y should be the same every time, since in matlab I am basically copying how liggghts defines, variables in hertz, from Y* until the stiffness (see link)

Can anyone give me suggestions ??

## How to LIGGGHTS this exercise :

- After downloading and unzipping the folder "ballfallingandbouncing1D"
- Create an empty folder named "post"
- Run the "1_in_Ballfall" in LIGGGHTS
- Copy files from "2_ until 5_" into the post folder
- Run all files containing "matlab" in the name in matlab in order of number (from 2 until 5)

Greetings,
Luca

aaigner's picture

aaigner | Fri, 10/23/2015 - 10:44

Hi Luca,

first .. please don't reference to an old documentation. Use the one provided by that website (here).

Nevertheless, the equations are still the same. LIGGGHTS was tested multiple times and each release is tested automatically, thus it should be correct.
Unfortunately, I didn't have the time to read all your scripts in detail, but the bottom wall is at 0.01 in LIGGGHTS and in your matlab-scripts at 0.? Or did I miss something?

Bests
Andreas