Hello all,
I would like to ask whether LIGGGHTS can be used for modelling continuous materials ? For example, modelling tensile test of aluminium specimen, then compare the stress-strain diagram with experimental data. Has anybody had experience with it ?
Thank you.
Vinh
paul | Mon, 08/20/2018 - 19:55
Using the BONDS fork, you may
Using the BONDS fork, you may have success in modelling material fatigue / breakage. Check out the work of Antonyuk for an example.
Otherwise, why not use FEM like a normal person? If you only look for deformation without breakage you won't exploit the advantage of using discrete elements.
dxvn818 | Tue, 08/21/2018 - 03:33
Hi Paul,
Hi Paul,
Yes, the main reason I use DEM is that I must deal with material failure and the material structure with coating layer and reinforcement is too complicated to use FEM or XFEM.
I am new to LIGGGHTS, could you please show me how to check out the Antonyuk 's work ? Is it available in LIGGGHTS-PUBLIC ?
Thank you.
Vinh
paul | Tue, 08/21/2018 - 09:53
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie400244x
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d009/d4174f309b1ccb31441f6ffddf20810f04...
He didn't use LIGGGHTS though. The BONDS fork of LIGGGHTS can be found in this forum, just look around.
dxvn818 | Wed, 08/22/2018 - 06:24
Hi Paul,
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your references. I have solved my problem by cohesive beam approach in GranOO, which is another DEM open source software, however, I need the coupling ability of LIGGGHTS and want to test spring-dashpot approach, that 's why I only focus on LIGGGHTS at this time. I will look for LIGGGHTS with BONDS to see how it works.
Vinh