Hi Christoph,
I was wondering, how do you generate non-spherical particles in LIGGGHTS according to the mesh scanned from Laser Scanner?
1) Simply fill in single particle inside the mesh manually with minimum number of particles?
2) or fill in automatically by means of certain algorithm according to the points or surfaces?
I think method 1) is not difficult but can not apply to large-scale case, for example thousands of rock with different shapes. So is it possible to generated rocks with random shapes based on basic types of rock (e.g. flat, compact and elongated) which are already scanned into mesh model?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
David Long
ckloss | Mon, 01/02/2012 - 15:55
Hi David, there are different
Hi David,
there are different methods available. For trivial cases, as you have guessed, a manual fit is best. For more complex cases, you typically you want to minimize the # of spheres used for the approximation. Maybe these papers can help: http://www.cogency.co.za/publications/7-shape-from-silhouette
Christoph
keepfit | Tue, 01/03/2012 - 13:17
thanks Christoph. Now I am
thanks Christoph.
Now I am using some other algorithm to generate stones with random , simple shapes (less than 10 spheres), which can be used to simulate large-scale project comprising many discrete stones efficiently.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/g1307987l7u18412/
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17486020802253992?journalCode...
http://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/docserver/fulltext/geot59-779.pdf?expir...
Cheers,
David Long
Bajo87 | Sun, 01/29/2012 - 00:26
Hi Christoph, can you explain
Hi Christoph,
can you explain how you are doing the "Multisphere from CAD model". I think it is just possible with the developer version of liggghts, but what functions do you use to realise it?
Is it also possible to generate e.g. a defined mass of multisphere particles?
thanks, best regards
Alex
ckloss | Mon, 01/30/2012 - 13:13
We have a paper in the
We have a paper in the pipeline about this:
"Approximation of objects by spheres for multisphere simulations in DEM", ECCOMAS 2012 Congress, MS202: Modelling of medium to dense gas-particle flows - Discrete element methods; Authors: S. Amberger, M. Friedl, C. Goniva, S. Pirker, C. Kloss, all Johannes Kepler University/AT
As available we will probably post the paper here
Christoph
Bajo87 | Thu, 03/15/2012 - 22:15
Hello Christoph, in the
Hello Christoph,
in the update 1.5.2 there is a new command "particletemplate/multisphere". I tried to test it put I didn't get it working, there is also no reference in the documentation. Can you explain me the code for a multisphere template with eg. 2 particles?
fix pts1 all particletemplate/multisphere ....
I think I will need the following commands "nr of spheres", "coordinates" , "radius", "density" but I don't know the right order and style for the multisphere template.
regards
Alex
ckloss | Fri, 03/16/2012 - 09:11
Hi Alex, do you mean fix
Hi Alex,
do you mean fix particletemplate/multiplespheres ? this was new in 1.5.1 to enable the breakage functionality, but I did not have time to add a doc, but have a look at the 'breakage' example.
Cheers, Christoph
Bajo87 | Fri, 03/16/2012 - 14:46
Hi Christoph, that's right, I
Hi Christoph,
that's right, I mean the particletemplate/multiplespheres command.
Thanks, I will test it with the breakage example.
regards, Alex
andybond13 | Wed, 06/12/2013 - 16:03
Has there been any progress
Has there been any progress on the documentation of this multi-sphere feature? The breakage example uses single-spheres of multiple sizes to eventually break a particle into a number of smaller ones, but doesn't provide a good example of bonded spheres that overlap (i.e. multi-sphere method).
The following video on the features page of the website does show what I'm interested in: complex particle shapes resulting from clumped/bonded spheres: http://cfdem.dcs-computing.com/media/DEM/nonspherical/multisphere.avi
Could you share the input file for this simulation?
Thanks - Andy
ckloss | Thu, 06/13/2013 - 17:56
Hi Andi,
Hi Andi,
this is not in the public release. In the next few months, we will make a major update of the website, denoting clearly which features are in the public version
Cheers
Christoph
nateanderson | Thu, 08/22/2013 - 19:23
Christoph,
Christoph,
I am in the process of evaluating software to determine which code my company should invest in. The website update would be helpful, but it appears that it has not be completed yet. Can you list which features are included in the public version?
Thanks
ckloss | Fri, 08/30/2013 - 15:36
Hi Nate,
Hi Nate,
thanks for your interest. We'll post the list here along with the website re-launch but not earlier.
If you need more information, feel free to mail me directly!
Cheers
Christoph