Hi
i'm currently trying to extend a working DEM-simulation with CFD.
The setting is like this: particles get moved trough a chute and a conveyor belt via DEM and end in a pipe where they should get sucked off via CFD. From what i‘ve understood by now, i need a mesh of the enviroment to get the CFD-part working. My question here is: do i need to mesh the whole enviroment or only the pipe where the particles get sucked off? When i only need the pipe, does it have to be closed on the ends?
I plan to mesh with snappyHexMesh and the .stl files which are already used for DEM. Is there anything else i need to keep in mind for this?
Greetings,
Johannes
paul | Tue, 05/22/2018 - 09:03
You do not have to mesh the
You do not have to mesh the entire domain. The outlet should ideally be open in the STL used for LIGGGHTS, for OpenFOAM it depends on your mesher.
jojo | Thu, 05/24/2018 - 19:36
Thank you for your answer!
Thank you for your answer!
I use different .stl files for LIGGGHTS and OpenFOAM, one with closed inlet and outlet for meshing, and an open one for DEM.
I can sucessfully run the snappyHexMesh and see my results in paraview, but im not sure weather the outcome is 100% right or i still have to do some work there -
the created polyMesh in the directory constant does not contain the boundaries i need, only "defaultFaces". The boundaries in 0.01 and 0.02 generated while meshing are correct. Is this normal or wrong?
When i open the .foam file in paraview, what i see on time 0 is the mesh generated by blockmesh, on time 0.01 its the mesh from snappyHexMesh.
Also, when trying to solve the CFD part, every result is zero.
Greetings, Johannes
paul | Fri, 05/25/2018 - 12:18
> The boundaries in 0.01 and
> The boundaries in 0.01 and 0.02 generated while meshing are correct. Is this normal or wrong?
>Also, when trying to solve the CFD part, every result is zero.
This is normal, just copy the polyMesh from 0.02 into constant and you're fine. Alternatively run snappyHexMesh -overwrite to do this automatically. And please read up on how snappy works - it will be useful for the future.
jojo | Sat, 05/26/2018 - 11:17
-overwrite was exactly the
-overwrite was exactly the command i needed, thank you!