CFDEM couplings for open/porous heat transfer

Submitted by yuanjl on Thu, 02/14/2013 - 14:06

Hi everyone,

I am just coming back with a new equiry on CFDEM coupling.

We are doing modeling and simulation of transport processes in the energy systems, and the physical domain consists of: 1) the porous layers with micro or even nano meter scaled pores/solid particles, 2) a open channel (for the fluid flow) surrouded by the solid plate, whose size (in mm) are much bigger than the porous layers to supply the reactants to the porous layers. The transport processes include the heat transfer (convection in the channels and pores, and conduction in the solid particles), mass transfer in the channels/pores, which are affected by the reactions on the solid particles in the porous layers.

I am just thinking if CFDEM coupling is able to be applied for this case? For instance, we may generate a box for the porous structures by some way, such as by LAMMPS or similar, and use CFDEMcoupling for the transport processes in the porous layers, and pure CFD for those in the non-porous regions. Is it feasible?

If it is positive, which method is the best for the porous structure construction (to represent the discrete solid materials and pores), in terms of data loading/exchange and inplementation in LIGGGHTS? As supposed, we are allowed to use multi-functions (or mudules) of the LAMMPS in the LIGGGHTS at the same time? Another question is that if it is possible to put the solid particles as the fixed ones, while the fluid in the pores are set as movable particles representing multi-compoent gas mixture?

All the comments and suggestions, even the references, are most welcome.

Thanks very much in advance...

Jinliang

jiatangwang | Fri, 01/17/2014 - 00:20

Hi ,in resent days i am learning my CFDEM coupling, and my purpose is same as you said in your comment.
Have you successed in your research in CFDEM coupling ??
How to solve the questions you said?
Please to give me some advice. Thanks very much.

cgoniva's picture

cgoniva | Tue, 02/04/2014 - 14:22

Hi,

what you wanna do sounds feasible. The size scales will get you into some troubles. You should at least use CGS units to overcome some problems here.

KR,
Chris

jiatangwang | Wed, 02/26/2014 - 09:20

hi,

I will have a try in the next step. After that I will faceback the results on this Furum.

Best wishes,
Jiatang